Sunday May 1,
2016
A Reflection
on John 14:23-29, N.A.B.
By: Larry T
At a recent
Scripture study class an older woman, a convert to Catholicism, frowned throughout
the discussion of infant baptism, and finally snorted, “Man-made laws – not
God’s laws!”
At yet
another meeting my cradle-Catholic friends said they had never been accused of
following man-made laws. But another
friend in the discussion group, also a convert, said, “I went to a Lutheran college
for four years and I know all about that!”
This
highlights the very different way in which Catholics and Protestants view the
Bible. Most Protestants believe the Bible contains all you need to know; it
doesn’t need to be supplemented with doctrines. Our Catholic perspective is the
Bible plus Tradition (as is expressed
in the Catechism of the Catholic Church).
Father Ronald
D. Witherup, S.S., Ph.D., writes in Biblical Fundamentalism, What Every
Catholic Should Know:
“From a Catholic perspective, as
important as the Bible is, it cannot serve alone as the sole source of
revelation. We should note, however, that the word ‘Tradition’, (note the
capital T) does not mean ‘traditions’ we remember as we grew up. Rather it refers
to the Church’s magisterial teaching through the ages as it has interpreted the
Scriptures, interacted with them, and formulated doctrines that expound God’s
revelation as humans can know it.”
Catholic Tradition is what some Protestants disdainfully
call man-made laws.
That is all
well and good, but how do we respond to a Protestant friend who asks, “Why do
you follow man-made laws instead of
God’s laws?” Is it enough to shrug our shoulders and reply, “Because I have
faith in the Church.”? Along that same line of thinking how much confidence can
Catholics have in the Church’s formulated doctrines and teaching? A good
starting point is in verse 26 of this Sunday’s Gospel reading:
23
Jesus answered and said to him, “Whoever loves me will keep my word, and my
Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our dwelling with him.
24
Whoever does not love me does not keep my words; yet the word you hear is not
mine but that of the Father who sent me.
25
“I have told you this while I am with you.
26
The Advocate, the holy Spirit that the Father will send in my name-he will
teach you everything and remind you of all that [I] told you.
27
Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you. Not as the world gives do I
give it to you. Do not let your hearts be troubled or afraid.
28
You heard me tell you, ‘I am going away and I will come back to you.’ If you
loved me, you would rejoice that I am going to the Father; for the Father is
greater than I.
29
And now I have told you this before it happens, so that when it happens you may
believe.
- John 14:23-29, N.A.B.
In this Last
Supper Discourse Jesus introduced the Advocate, the Holy Spirit, to his
disciples to assure them of God’s continued presence on earth after his return
to the Father. At that time the meaning of “he
will teach you everything and remind you of all that [I] told you.” was probably
beyond the disciple’s comprehension.
Father Roch
A. Kereszty O.Cist., writes in Jesus Christ: Fundamentals of Christology:
“God would have been a poor
communicator or rather no communicator at all, had he left the interpretation
of the inspired biblical witness to his Son to the ever-changing and mutually
contradictory whims of human interpreters. Working in different way through the
liturgy, the Magesterium, the theologians, and the Christian faithful, Christ
himself has guided the Church through his spirit on the often-torturous path of
understanding his own mystery.”
What evidence
is there that the Holy Spirit has piloted the Catholic Church from its very
beginning? Protestants and Catholics will agree that the four Gospel authors were
inspired by the Holy Spirit to write what was necessary for the salvation of
the souls of their individual church communities and ultimately the Universal
Church. By 375 A.D. eighty heresies, many of which dealt with the divinity of
Jesus, had arisen; it took the sure hand of the Holy Spirit to guide the Church
through them. Our Protestant friends would have to agree that the Holy Spirit was
present at the Synod of Hippo in 393 A.D. when the council of bishops listed
and approved the books to be included in the Bible. Nor can we forget that many
of the Church’s so called man-made
laws were in direct response to a dispute or crisis of some sort. For example,
it was the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. that settled the question of the
nature of Jesus in his relationship to the Father and gave us the Nicene Creed.
The most significant event in the modern era of our Church was the Second
Vatican Council (1962-1965); who will deny the influence of the Holy Spirit
over it? The more we study our Church’s history the more convinced we will be
that the Holy Spirit has been at the helm all along. And we can take comfort in
the knowledge that He will continue to lead our Church through the challenges
that are yet to come.
So then, is
the Protestant way of viewing the Bible wrong? Not necessarily! After all, Protestants
are Christians too, and we’re all in the same boat. There is the Protestant way
and there is the Catholic way. When we’re asked why we believe in man-made laws the proper response is:
Just as we accept the Holy Spirit’s
role in the inspiration of the Bible, so we believe the Holy Spirit guides the
Church in its teaching and prevents it from falling into errors on matters of
doctrine and morality.